[Boatanchors] 6146 vs 6146A vs 6146B or 6146W
lee
pulsarxp at embarqmail.com
Tue Jul 5 19:00:51 EDT 2011
Your article frankly does not mean a hill of beans to me any longer. It
once did! You keep rehashing Motorola and Collins who had other
considerations in play during the period in which you speak. I too have
rebuilt a lot of equipment. In fact I'll stack up my collection against
anyone's including yours. I have never had a problem using B tubes in a
piece of equipment which originally came with A type tubes. That said.
Anyone can do anything they want with their equipment. My experience with
the B tubes taught me your article's warning is unwarranted when it comes to
ham HF equipment. I have used the B tubes too many times to fall for your
theory or warning. I have found out there is no reason to fear using B
tubes in place of A tubes. You have a better chance of finding a bad new
resistor or capacitor then you will find having a problem using a B tube in
an A tube socket. The reason I brought all this up is because your article
puts unwarranted fear into too many non informed hams minds.
As to why a manufacture built a tube a slightly different way for a
particular manufacturer, I can offer many reasons why this happened and it
had nothing to do with operating the tube. Why do some tubes have more then
one nomenclature or have a 4 digit number rather then an alpha/numeric
nomenclature? There were a lot of reasons they did this which had nothing
to do with their performance. Sometimes it did and some times it did not.
Guys risk their transformers every day by reforming 50 year old
electrolytics or continue to use old ones in their rigs which puts them at a
much greater risk then a once in a zillion times of having a problem putting
a B tube in an A tube socket. The risk you mention is about as risky as
using a solid state rig because during an atomic blast, the solid state rig
might get put out of action where a tube rig would continue to perform.
Lee, w0vt
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Zook
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 5:27 PM
To: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net ; lee
Subject: Re: [Boatanchors] 6146 vs 6146A vs 6146B or 6146W
Of course, you are entitled to your opinion. Also, I have stated many
times, as well in the article, that many people have not had any problems
using the 6146B/8298A in equipment designed for the older tubes.
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list