[CW] RV: Why not separated RX+TX...?

Wed, 19 Jun 2002 14:08:23 -0300

----- Original Message -----
From: Uranito <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: Why not separated RX+TX...?


> Hello dear David.
>
> Many thanks for your information.
> I have an HQ180A/X in perfect conditions.
> I said A/X because the plate said HQ180A but the manual named it HQ180X
> because the XTALs sockets and switch in place of the clock.
>
> With the XCVERs used today, no to many amateurs knows hot to do a Zero
> Beat...HI HI
> I think that the dupla TX plus separated RX is better than a XCVER.
>
> Muchos saludos y buenos DX
> Best regards and good DX
> Alberto U. SILVA LU1DZ
> GACW Coordinator
> http://gacw.no-ip.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: "Uranito" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 11:08 AM
> Subject: RE: [CW] RX+TX
>
>
> > I use Drake T4X-B transmitter and R-4B receiver with a Johnson T-R
switch
> for QSK.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > David Ring
> > N1EA
> >
> >
> > "Uranito" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >Hello dear OMs.
> > >
> > >Is there any member still using separated TX and RX...?
> > >
> > >I am using an FTT101ZD as a transmittter and a german RX RFT EKD500 in
40
> > >and 80 m. very often.
> > >I tested this RX and it looks better than any other that I have.
> > >
> > >Best regards
> > >
> > >Alberto LU1DZ / AY1DZ
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >CW mailing list
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________
> > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
> Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!
> http://shopnow.netscape.com/
> >
> > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
> http://webmail.netscape.com/
> >
> >
>