[FedCom] New FAA Monitoring Rules?

Tue, 23 Apr 2002 05:23:47 -0700 (PDT)

Citizens have access to their laws.

No access, no law.

My $.02.

I had my scanner at the Blues first post 911 airshow.  I was searched by the
Nat Guard, but no problem with the scanner.  My brother entered separately, he
had no problem either.

Tom
--- "Thomas J. Dalrymple" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, Saturday I'm taking my trusty Pro-43, and I'll camp out at the
> observation
> lot near Baltimore-Washington International (if the lot is still open!).  If
> I'm
> not chased away in two hours, I'm moving down to the lot north of the runway
> at
> Reagan National.  I'll let you all know what happens Sunday, if I'm not in
> the
> FAA lockup.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> On Behalf Of Paul Cobb
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:31 PM
> 
> Afternoon Gents:
> A word of caution from the south.
> Two different friends were monitoring at Peachtree-DeKalb & Hartsfield
> Int'l. They were approached by the
> local airport police unit. They were asked for ID and told that the FAA has
> asked that NO ONE monitor aircraft activity at airports. A call to the FAA
> PIO stated that there is a NEW provision in the Terriorist Controls to
> prohibit monitoring of aircraft AND other critical radio
> activities at ALL CONTROLLED airports. I have requested a copy of the
> Terriorists Controls from my Congressman for clarification. His Office
> Manager in DC returned my call and said the literature was of RESTRICTED
> ACCESS and was not available to the
> average citizen.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/