[FedCom] Did I go OT ?
A10382
[email protected]
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:20:32 -0400
Hi Gary,
This topic is showing up on a number of lists, including 'SWL' and
'sannist'. It is germane to all of us in all radio venues.
The 'ham-policy' list was originally created by Al Waller in an attempt to
move this type of discussion there. While there are a lot of list members,
the traffic there is a bit thin.
I ran a post on 'ham-policy' a few days ago about this general topic and
recent fed legislation in an attempt to ripple some brain cells. Some, but
limited, response.
73
Frank
._._.
----- Original Message -----
From: "gary" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: [FedCom] Did I go OT ?
> The same thread is showing up on all the scanner mailing lists. I'd
suggest
> somebody who is really concerned with monitoring rights start another
list,
> then occasionally spam the scanning lists.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Tom M.
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 5:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FedCom] Did I go OT ?
>
>
> If there are news laws which affect the mission of the list, I'd say post
> them.
>
> Tom
> --- A10382 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My question is:
> >
> > For this list, is discussion of our 'rights' to monitor radio broadcasts
> the
> > appropriate venue ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
>