[FedCom] Re: FedCom New England Unknown

Fri, 04 Jul 2003 17:55:17 -0400

    Since the signal is encypted it is irrelevant what encryption method is used.

[email protected] wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:26:35 -0400
> > From: john wilson <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [FedCom] New England Unknown
> >
> >  I never said 173.7875 mhz. had to be a FBI repeater operation for New
> > England.  You asked for possible users of the frequency.  Since the pl is
> > not
> > 167.9, obviously it is not the FBI.  However the FBI is a main possible user
> > of
> > this frequency.  FYI they have a strong 173.7875 mhz. DVP repeater operation
> > in
> > eastern Virginia.
>
>   OK, since we're apparently striving to be very accurate here, what makes
> you sure it's "DVP" and not DES, the XL enhancements, or a stronger encryption
> scheme?
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom