[FedCom] Re: FedCom New England Unknown

Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:36:51 EDT

In a message dated 7/5/2003 1:00:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> From: john wilson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FedCom] Re: FedCom New England Unknown
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
>   Since the signal is encypted it is irrelevant what encryption method is 
> used.

   It's irrelvent to *you*.

     You don't have a clue what crypto scheme was used, and just arbitrarily 
decided to refer to it as the generic "DVP."  

   You also made the assertion "Since the pl is not 167.9, obviously it is 
not the FBI" which is rather silly.

   At first, I thought you might have had some special knowledge or 
understanding which caused you to state some of the things you did, so I asked how you 
knew it was DVP.      But know we've all learned that you have a tendency to 
make some claims which you can't always back-up, and that tidbit helps us all 
who do try to be accurate.

  Peer review is a wonderful thing.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---