[FedCom] Re: FedCom New England Unknown

Sun, 06 Jul 2003 11:00:24 -0400

Grow up.

[email protected] wrote:

> In a message dated 7/5/2003 1:00:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> > From: john wilson <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [FedCom] Re: FedCom New England Unknown
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> >
> >   Since the signal is encypted it is irrelevant what encryption method is
> > used.
>
>    It's irrelvent to *you*.
>
>      You don't have a clue what crypto scheme was used, and just arbitrarily
> decided to refer to it as the generic "DVP."
>
>    You also made the assertion "Since the pl is not 167.9, obviously it is
> not the FBI" which is rather silly.
>
>    At first, I thought you might have had some special knowledge or
> understanding which caused you to state some of the things you did, so I asked how you
> knew it was DVP.      But know we've all learned that you have a tendency to
> make some claims which you can't always back-up, and that tidbit helps us all
> who do try to be accurate.
>
>   Peer review is a wonderful thing.
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom