[FedCom] Re: Pop'Comm Columnists Phone Tapped??
Richard Crisp
rdcrisp at earthlink.net
Fri Sep 10 23:41:03 EDT 2004
----- Original Message -----
From: <lists at lazygranch.com>
To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications"
<fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [FedCom] Re: Pop'Comm Columnists Phone Tapped??
> You were doing good unitl you said you didn't know how to monitor cell
> phone calls. This is where things get dicey because lying to a federal
so when did Douglass say he didn't know how to monitor cell calls? That's
not what I read in his story below, in fact he said just the opposite.
> agent is in itself a crime. [It's that obstruction of justice charge
I can't understand why anyone would voluntarily talk to a fed. if you make a
simple honest mistake and say something that is false you have committed the
same felony as to intentionally lie to them. Forget it brother, unless I am
compelled to talk to them, I'm not going to say a word.
More information about the FedCom
mailing list