[FedCom] RE: Frequency Verification

[News1]

The best reason is so you don't have to listen to the DES encryption
"noise". When they are coded there is no PL.  By using the PL you only hear
transmissions that are in the clear. 

Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of RadioScan at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 9:05 AM
To: fedcom at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [FedCom] RE: Frequency Verification

These are Fed frequenies we are talking about, so why would you really want 
to put the PL  in for the FBI anyway...who else would be using that
frequency 
that you "wouldn't want to monitor"?  It is not like it is some fire or
police 
frequency.

> Good.  You are doing a modified version of what I recommended in a recent
> post.  You never know.  For example, I monitored the FBI in Philadelphia
on
> their common frequency with a PL of 167.9.  I, also, have the frequency
> listed with no PL and received another transmission in P25.
> 

_______________________________________________
FedCom mailing list
FedCom at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom