DOE Convoy Comms & Re: [FedCom] Transporter Picture

[lists]

You could get one of the cheaper unidens for Close Call, such as the 
246, if you wanted to dedicate one for just that function. I can't stand 
how Uniden APCO sounds, but I wouldn't mind getting a non-digital 
scanner just for the Close Call feature, then use GRE for APCO.

When I toured the Nevada Test Site, the low level radiation dump is part 
of the tour. I'm sure (but not positive) there was a DOT radiation 
warning on the back of the trailer that I saw at the dump.

I found a DOT nuke sign on the web, though I doubt this link will 
survive email:
<http://www.safetyemporium.com/ILPI_Site/WebPagesUS/detail.htm&&2eiBpe0obDuox2NvxMpoLGxolobo2bbBeJ1gcRSONaVbCRI5ws9nhkia74_alWSaqqWaXSa?03135-A>
In any event, while you can make the truck "stealth", can it travel 
legally without a warning sign?

News1 wrote:
> 
> On a related note for anyone that hasn't used the "close call" functions on
> the new scanner they are cool. I bought a 396 several weeks ago and some day
> I've got to use the radio function, currently I'm just running close call.
> Side by side with a scout the scout will get the short data type xmitters
> more often/quicker but for a voice transmission the 396 is great. I suspect
> they had to do the button push to see the frequency to avoid stepping on
> Opto's patent and that's the only complaint I have with the device.
> Considering the size and cost (both slightly larger) the scout may get
> replaced with a 396 dedicated to run close call. 
> 
> 
> 
> Terry