Possible International Protection Intrigue at you local Business Airport Re: [FedCom] State Dept Dignitary Protection

[Greg Brazil]

Thanks Ken. I worked on one of there systems out here in SF Bay Area 
years ago and thought it was 409.2, but you know what you get with a old 
mind.  The system that I worked on was a satellite receiver on Mt. San 
Bruno.
Greg
SF Bay Area

Ken wrote:

> Hello Greg:
> 
> Tom Kneitel's outstanding book  "The 'Top Secret' Registry of US 
> Government Frequencies", 8th edition indicates that 409.625, 409.70, & 
> 411.15 were used extensively as repeater outputs in the early 1990's.  
> I'm not sure if much has changed recently...  I think that this would be 
> a start perhaps with some additional search in the 408 to 420 mhz band.
> 
> Perhaps some of the other fine "colleagues" on the list will be able to 
> provide much more definitive actual recent monitoring results.
> 
> 
> Ken
> Springfield MA Monitoring Area
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Brazil" <baycomm at earthlink.net>
> To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications" 
> <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 4:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [FedCom] State Dept Dignitary Protection
> 
> 
>> Why during this whole discussion has not one of you posters posted one 
>> State Dept. UHF frequency to try, unless I missed it?.
>> Greg (SF Bay Area)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> FedCom at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
> 
>