[FedCom] monitoring status?

[Rankin, Robert L]

Why?   You don't think they conduct in-service training?  I know they do.
 
>  That's one of the stupidest responses I have ever seen on Fedcom!
 
In a message dated 8/3/2006 12:50:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, fedcom-request at mailman.qth.net writes:

	Message: 1
	Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:32:24 -0500
	From: "Rankin, Robert L" <rankin at ku.edu>
	Subject: RE: [FedCom] Re: Monitoring Status
	To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications"
	    <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
	Message-ID:
	    <C70AC5440FBE564E828E8051E8D3CBE6044894DE at MAILBOXSIX.home.ku.edu>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
	
	You may well be hearing training ops for agents who don't yet know the city very well.  Those are often held in the clear while real ops are encrypted.
	
	________________________________
	
	Anyone who hears enough info to figure  out the who/what/where/when of a
	surveillance are hearing "sensitive stuff"  that the agents/agencies don't want us
	to hear.