[FedCom] Monitoring Status?

[Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps]

Somehow I knew you would be the first to respond.  I know you and others pay
$$$ for scanners and enjoy the "hunt".  That is fine.  It's your thing!
Personally, I'd rater to hear actual communications.  That is my thing.
Tomorrow, I will be more than happy to post the frequencies that were my
favorites.  Have a good evening. 

-----Original Message-----
From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 9:22 PM
To: Discussion of Federal Government Communications
Subject: Re: [FedCom] Monitoring Status?

Well whether it's encrypted or not it's still radiating a signal that at
least will show what frequencies are in use in a particular area.  Sometimes
with the use of the scanner's signal strength indicator, one can figure out
if it's simplex, repeater input, or repeater... That's kind of the challenge
& fun of the monitoring hobby.

Perhaps you would like to share your findings with the group about the
frequencies you've monitored that are now encrypted in your area?

K



----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps" <aphelps at enter.net>
To: "'Discussion of Federal Government Communications'" 
<fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 9:09 PM
Subject: [FedCom] Monitoring Status?


> Prior to May, I was fortunate enough to hear several fed. frequencies and
> ops. in the clear almost daily (FBI, ATF, DEA).  Since then all
> transmissions, both analog and P25 have been encrypted.   I also notice 
> that
> activity/postings on this site have declined substantially.  I guess the
> tide is turning. As the trees fall so winds the river.


_______________________________________________
FedCom mailing list
FedCom at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom