DMAT Encryption Re: [FedCom] DMAT new frequency?
Ken
rfinder1 at verizon.net
Sun May 21 17:37:14 EDT 2006
Encryption masks the signal content BUT not the presence of a signal.
There's no indication that
encryption will prevent this sort of situation. Take Iraq as an example:
Radio comms are
irrelevant, it's all done by covert observation. I'm not sure what the
response time is for
DMAT but I'd assume it's going to be greater than 8 hours. I do agree with
you though that
in the event of a major bombing incident, law enforcement authorities need
to at least sweep
the areas where the response vehicles are going to be parked.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "OHIOSCAN" <Mikef at Ohioscan.net>
To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications"
<fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [FedCom] DMAT new frequency?
..snip...snip..
>
> Not to mention the bad guys have been known to setup a delayed IED for
> first responders.
>
> Mike
More information about the FedCom
mailing list