[FedCom] 167.4875/172.325 Surveillance "On Scene" Monitoring???

[Gil woodside]

Ken,
   Thats why I didn't give any locations or landmarks theyw ere talking 
about. I do, however, know where they were operating.

Gil
central Rhode Island

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken" <rfinder1 at verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications" 
<fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [FedCom] 167.4875/172.325 Surveillance "On Scene" Monitoring???


> Anyone remember the incident many years ago involving a monitoring 
> hobbyists in the Baltimore MD area who tipped off the occupants of a 
> particular location under surveillance & basically got hauled into court? 
> BUT VERY fortunately got by with probation BUT as a condition of probation 
> could not have a radio scanner!!!    I think the probation period was 3 
> years!
>
> So anyone should consider the ramifications IF they decide to try run 
> surveillance on the survelliance so to speak...   3 years is a heck of a 
> long time without a scanner!!!!!
>
> K
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "J White" <jawhite13 at hotmail.com>
> To: <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 7:10 PM
> Subject: [FedCom] 167.4875/172.325
>
>
> Hello Gil,
>
> Do you know where these surveillances are taking place?
>
> Regards,
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> FedCom at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> FedCom at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
>