[FedCom] MT "Fed Files" Column Nov 06 Edition

[Rankin, Robert L]

I can't see that it's either easy or desirable to separate fed/mil comms, especially above the h.f. region.  They all tend to interact a lot, especially in any kind of emergency, so I think we should be accomodating of both whenever possible.
 
Bob, w0nxn

________________________________

From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Ken
Sent: Sun 11/12/2006 12:30 PM
To: Discussion of Federal Government Communications
Subject: Re: [FedCom] MT "Fed Files" Column Nov 06 Edition



Groom Lake is milcom related not fedcom....

SFO TSA contracted operations still is an oddity since the federal
government in many contracted
operations, still provides access to the federal radio systems for use by
the contractor, especially in sensitive type operations.  For example most
GSA/ building security is provided by  contracted security forces that uses
the FPS radio equipment & frequencies.  The DHS FPS officer's supervise the
contracted operations BUT do get involved with direct operations if
required.

K

----- Original Message -----
From: "gary" <lists at lazygranch.com>
To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications"
<fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [FedCom] MT "Fed Files" Column Nov 06 Edition


> The first article is about an oddity regarding the TSA at SFO. SFO uses a
> private company for screening, which probably is the reason for the
> oddity.
>
> I don't know if it was his column, but Monitoring Times published data on
> the Nellis range (NTS, Groom Lake) that was lifted from radioreference.com
> without giving them credit. The mistakes on radio reference were printed
> in the magazine.


_______________________________________________
FedCom mailing list
FedCom at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom