[FedCom] re: CAP OPSEC
BEADWINDOW at aol.com
BEADWINDOW at aol.com
Sat Sep 23 22:46:03 EDT 2006
CAP is told to start using a little more OPSEC, and some of you guys go nuts
& launch some warped campaign to defeat it. CAP isn't being all paranoid &
encrypting circuits, they're just not going to make the data available to
anyone & everyone -- including CAP members who don't need it. If a CAP member
has a scanner, he or she will probably be able to figure out how to use it to
find CAP freqs if they want to. Such knowledge isn't restricted to the holy
wise men of FEDCOM.
CAP is going to have an increased role in some Homeland Security missions.
Sounds like a good, relatively inexpensive use of CAP to me. Homeland
Security missions are FOUO. DHS/USAF/CAP takes some very simple efforts to improve
OPSEC, and some of you end up getting very emotional about it, and post some
pretty dumb things -- mostly straw-man arguments.
Just because CAP isn't going to publish ther freq/channel plan, it doesn't
mean they're doing so because its the only thing they can do to protect
their comms, nor has CAP ever implied that the proposed radio comm plan is going
to magically result in their communications being secure. If CAP is going
to work with DEA, the only thing that will exclude CAP's ability to use secure
DEA channels is some of your imaginations.
More information about the FedCom
mailing list