[FedCom] Twin Cities Monitors
J&D Schnoor
jimdianes at frontiernet.net
Wed Aug 8 23:58:06 EDT 2007
I am located here in the suburban Twin Cities Metropolitan area and I can't
recall many people posting much of anything regarding federal here in
Minnesota in the past. But that is not the purpose of my post.
I am wondering how many federal monitors here are anxiously awaiting the
arrival of the forthcoming GRE PSR-500 and PSR-600. I was thinking that the
ability to have PL/DPL decoding AND NAC decoding should be of value to
federal monitors. For example, say a given frequency is used both analog
and P-25. Simply program it once as analog with the correct PL tone,
assuming one is used, and program a second time as digital with the correct
NAC code. Hopefully if they are on analog, but not in the clear, they will
not be heard becasue of the PL tone. If they are P-25 I hope the radio only
passes audio if it is not encrypted. Plus there shouldn't be a whole lot of
inter-modulation, mixing, front end overload with the decoding ability.
I have a Uniden Bearcat BCD996T now. With the federal frequencies that I
monitor now that are analog, I program the PL tone, if one is used, but it
isn't quite so simply for P-25 channels.
Slightly back to the bridge collapse, does anybody what frequencies the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers is now using? I was at Lock and Dam 1 a couple of
weeks ago and it looked to me as if the employee I spoke with had a Motorola
VHF P-25 portable with him.
More information about the FedCom
mailing list