[FedCom] Penalties for release of SBU ???

[Kevin O'Rourke]

Here's an idea, Peter - could you post the links to the documents?  That 
way there is no chance of getting in trouble for reposting the actual 
documents.....

fedcom-request at mailman.qth.net wrote:

>Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
>From: hithel <hithel at yahoo.com>
>Subject: [FedCom] Penalties for release of SBU ???
>To: fedcom at mailman.qth.net
>Message-ID: <371932.59441.qm at web52711.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>I have a document that I found on a federal website that says - 'For Official Use Only - contains info that is Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) - not releaseable under Freedom of Info Act'.
>
>A search at Wikipedia suggests that this type of classification is controversial. I am wondering if there any penalties if I put it on the Internet. It is a 2009 map with radio freqs. There are no telephone numbers or email addresses on the document - or anything else that looks problematic to my eye.
>
>I found a different document from Alaska this morning. It also has maps and radio freqs - but no SBU designation. This 2nd document does have telephone numbers and email addresses that 'I' would not want to put on the Net.
>
>
>
>Peter Sz
>  
>