[FedCom] Troops Deploy to Border Areas
Roger Strohmeyer
roger.stroh at gmail.com
Tue Aug 3 22:53:54 EDT 2010
Interesting. I wonder if the BP simply issues the NG portables, vice
versa, or if the NG has a way to "patch me through to Dano" to the
BP's P-25 system?
IMHO It would make sense for places like Maricopa County to consider a
full blown P-25 system....too many "bad" prying ears listening for PD
movements.
-Roger
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Duane Donovan <ironman68_1998 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> BP uses those P25 radios with full encryption. Back in 2003 and 2006 I went to South Texas and visited my sister's family. It was all in the clear. These days they are all encrypted. Now My sister lives in New York. When I go up there I will take my BC996T and see what I can find.
>
> Duane
>
>
> --- On Mon, 8/2/10, Roger Strohmeyer <roger.stroh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Roger Strohmeyer <roger.stroh at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [FedCom] Troops Deploy to Border Areas
> > To: "Discussion of Federal Government Communications" <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> > Date: Monday, August 2, 2010, 9:26 PM
> > And the deployment of the NG
> > *started* August 1st with no actual date when
> > they will actually be in place...just another foot dragging
> > Obama dog and
> > pony show that adds up to nothing but a facade &
> > joke....and the joke is on
> > the decent people of the people of places like southern
> > Arizona who are
> > literally being overrun. I mean, let's be fair here...the
> > last
> > Administration handled the border\Illegal Immigration
> > issues very, very
> > poorly too. Too many big people making big money off of
> > Illegals and some
> > that value them for their eventual votes hence the term
> > "Undocumented
> > Democrats". ;-) What a mess.
> >
> > Anyway, back to monitoring part I suppose the BP and NG
> > will have some sort
> > of nifty encrypted radios for communicating or perhaps
> > they'll use something
> > as simple as Nextel?
> >
> > I was hoping Radio Reference might have somebody that was
> > gutsy enough to
> > setup a Border Patrol feed but that doesn't seem to be the
> > case. ;-)
> >
> > http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?stid=4
> >
> > -Roger
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Duane Donovan <ironman68_1998 at yahoo.com>wrote:
> >
> > > They can train on whatever they want. The BP agents
> > have to babysit the NG.
> > > The great pumkin might get them. NOT, repeat NOT
> > ALLOWED at election time.
> > > The drones are being used for speed enforcement of
> > U>S> drivers. There will
> > > be no, repeat no attempt to stop the illegals. If the
> > NG carried ammo and
> > > went out to actively enforce the border then they
> > would acomplish something.
> > > Duane
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Sun, 8/1/10, lists at lazygranch.com
> > <lists at lazygranch.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: lists at lazygranch.com
> > <lists at lazygranch.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [FedCom] Troops Deploy to Border
> > Areas
> > > > To: "Discussion of Federal Government
> > Communications" <
> > > fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> > > > Date: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 10:07 AM
> > > > Its a dog and pony show unless the
> > > > national guard frees up ICE personal who were
> > doing the
> > > > paperwork to get their boots on the ground.
> > > >
> > > > If they are running Predator drones at the
> > border, I could
> > > > see the national guard aiding there. BTW, the
> > guard trains
> > > > on UAVs at KVCV.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Duane Donovan <ironman68_1998 at yahoo.com>
> > > > Sender: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > > > Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 06:19:26
> > > > To: Discussion of Federal Government
> > Communications<
> > > fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> > > > Reply-To: Discussion of Federal Government
> > Communications
> > > > <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> > > > Subject: Re: [FedCom] Troops Deploy to Border
> > Areas
> > > >
> > > > My Brother-in-law is a Border Patrol Agent. The
> > NG mans
> > > > static posts and the BP agents have to stay with
> > them to
> > > > protect them from the drug cartels. No patrolling
> > gets done.
> > > > The NG has zero rounds. It is all a dog and pony
> > show.
> > > > Duane
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Sat, 7/31/10, gary <lists at lazygranch.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: gary <lists at lazygranch.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [FedCom] Troops Deploy to
> > Border Areas
> > > > > To: "Discussion of Federal Government
> > Communications"
> > > > <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> > > > > Date: Saturday, July 31, 2010, 8:12 PM
> > > > > The original news reports said the
> > > > > troops would be filing paper. Reality
> > > > > is always another story. The government
> > tries to
> > > > avoid
> > > > > appearances of
> > > > > violating Posse Comitatus.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/31/2010 4:27 PM, Chris Parris wrote:
> > > > > > National Guard troops are beginning
> > their
> > > > deployment
> > > > > along the US-
> > > > > > Mexico border. Troops will be deployed
> > in Texas,
> > > > New
> > > > > Mexico, Arizona
> > > > > > and California to help support the
> > Border Patrol
> > > > with
> > > > > border security.
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
More information about the FedCom
mailing list