[FedCom] DHS Spent $430 Million on Radios Its Employees Don’t Know How to Use

[tvsjr]

No, it's a typical government project. They use a bit of everything. Moto is the most common but certainly not exclusive. 



-------- Original message --------
From: Roger Strohmeyer <roger.stroh at gmail.com> 
Date:  
To: tvsjr <tvsjr at tvsjr.com>,Discussion of Federal Government Communications <fedcom at mailman.qth.net> 
Subject: Re: [FedCom] DHS Spent $430 Million on Radios Its Employees Don’t Know How to Use 
 
So the Thales radios have nothing to do with nothing and they use only
Motorola?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:34 AM, tvsjr <tvsjr at tvsjr.com> wrote:

> Treasury common, now DHS common, if I had to guess.
>
> What radios? Predominantly Moto - mobiles with W3 and O3 handheld control
> heads, XTS5000, APX.
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: bernieS <bernies at netaxs.com>
> Date:
> To: Fedcom <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: [FedCom] DHS Spent $430 Million on Radios Its Employees Don’t
> Know How to Use
>
> What is this "common secure channel" referenced
> in this article?  What radio models does DHS use?
>
> -bernieS
>
>
>
> http://www.ticklethewire.com/2012/11/23/homeland-security-has-spent-430-million-on-radios-its-employees-don%E2%80%99t-know-how-to-use/
>
> Homeland Security Has Spent $430 Million on
> Radios Its Employees Don’t Know How to Use
> By Theodoric Meyer ProPublica
>
> Getting the agencies responsible for national
> security to communicate better was one of the
> main reasons the Department of Homeland Security
> was created after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
>
> But according to a recent report from the
> department’s inspector general, one aspect of
> this mission remains far from accomplished.
>
> DHS has spent $430 million over the past nine
> years to provide radios tuned to a common, secure
> channel to 123,000 employees across the country.
> Problem is, no one seems to know how to use them.
>
> Only one of 479 DHS employees surveyed by the
> inspector general’s office was actually able to
> use the common channel, according to the report.
> Most of those surveyed ­ 72 percent ­ didn’t even
> know the common channel existed. Another 25
> percent knew the channel existed but weren’t able
> to find it; 3 percent were able to find an older
> common channel, but not the current one.
>
> The investigators also found that more than half
> of the radios did not have the settings for the
> common channel programmed into them. Only 20
> percent of radios tested had all the correct settings.
>
> The radios are supposed to help employees of
> Customs and Border Patrol, the Transportation
> Security Administration, the Coast Guard,
> Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal
> Emergency Management Agency, the Secret Service,
> and other agencies with DHS communicate during
> crises, as well as normal operations.
>
> DHS officials did not immediately respond to
> questions from ProPublica about what effect the
> radio problems could have on how the agency handles an emergency.
>
> The $430 million paid for radio infrastructure
> and maintenance as well as the actual radios.
>
> In a response letter to the report, Jim H.
> Crumpacker, the Department of Homeland Security’s
> liaison between the Government Accountability
> Office and the inspector general, wrote that DHS
> had made “significant strides” in improving
> emergency communications since 2003. But he
> acknowledged that DHS “has had some challenges in
> achieving Department-wide interoperable communications goals.”
>
> The recent inspector general’s report is the
> latest in a string of critical assessments DHS
> has received on its efforts to improve
> communication between federal, state and local
> agencies. The Government Accountability Office
> reported in 2007 that the Department of Homeland
> Security had “generally not achieved” this goal.
>
> DHS has assigned a blizzard of offices and
> committees to oversee its radio effort since
> 2003, which the inspector general’s report
> claimed had “hindered DHS’ ability to provide effective oversight.”
>
> Also, none of the entities “had the authority to
> implement and enforce their recommendations,” the
> report concluded. Tanya Callender, a spokeswoman
> for the inspector general, said the current
> office overseeing the effort hadn’t been given
> the authority to force agencies to use the common
> channel or even to provide instructions for programming the radios.
>
> The inspector general recommended DHS standardize
> its policies regarding radios, which DHS agreed
> to do. But it rejected a second recommendation
> that it overhaul the office overseeing the radios to give it more
> authority.
>
> “DHS believes that it has already established a
> structure with the necessary authority to ensure”
> that its various agencies can communicate,
> Crumpacker wrote in his response letter.
>
> ProPublica is a non-profit investigative journalism website.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>