[FedCom] FedCom Digest, Vol 121, Issue 4

[Eric C. Carlson]

It's not a typo.  The analog Nets have been replaced.

-Eric

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:00 AM,  <fedcom-request at mailman.qth.net> wrote:

> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:37:10 -0500
> From: Tom ND5Y via FedCom <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> To: Discussion of Federal Government Communications
>         <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [FedCom] Houston area CBP Nets update
> Message-ID: <539CB276.6050903 at yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Is that 165.2375 input a typo? Are there still repeater outputs on
> 165.2375 in the Houston area? It seems strange they would use that as an
> input.
>
> Here in Wichita Falls they replaced the 169.45 analog repeater with a
> 172.0625 D-NET 202 repeater last year. I was never able to find the
> input when they were testing it and it is very rarely used but makes
> some type of P25 data burst about every 5 minutes or so.
>
> Tom