[FedCom] 406.200 FPS ...NAC 611?

[Jeff Kenyon]

I’ve noticed that a lot of federal conventional P25 uses a NAC of 293.  Not sure if this is just by coincidence but 293 seems to be a NAC that is often used when the frequency is listed as being encrypted, but the NAC I don’t think would matter so much as the other steps in encrypting the frequency.
Sent from my iPhone

> On May 28, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Bill Dunn <ecps92 at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> The only known $611 I've had were all in the VHF band and traced back to the USSS
> 
> Interesting...   on your ICOM ??
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of Federal Government Communications <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: May 28, 2024 4:11 PM
> To: <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: [FedCom] 406.200 FPS ...NAC 611?
> 
> I was just monitoring on 406.200 getting N201 and N207 and NAC 611 came
> out? I missed the RID will keep at it any body have any ideas?...73,s Marcy
> ______________________________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html