[FedCom] 173.4625

[~Bill]

WE used to have some folks on here, from Vermont and the Vermont Repeaters
(Ascutney, Okemo and Mansfield) have not been reported in years.
https://mt-fedfiles.blogspot.com/p/army-corps-of-engineers-frequencies.html

Keep in mind Thursdays and Fridays around 8a/9a is most of the traffic


Bill - N1KUG
Boston, Mass
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://scanmaritime.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of ~Bill via FedCom
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2026 9:26 AM
To: 'Marcie'; 'Discussion of Federal Government Communications'
Subject: Re: [FedCom] 173.4625

Excactly, since we have multiple agencies in our region (Northeast) that use
the same NAC, a little more time and investigation/monitoring  is needed.

Since you indicate CLR that pushes me more to ACoE, but also what was the
type of traffic, time of day etc?

ACoE in the Northeast has a wide-area NET for the Dam/Reservoir Control and
does regular NETS with the dams
https://www.snewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=US_Army_Corp_of_Engineers_New_E
ngland

Also the other value is the Radio ID's, if properly programmed by the Agency
If I recall Reservoir Control (formerly Waltham MA) was using i1 (yup, radio
ID of ONE)


BTW your original 173.4625 landed around 6:01pm damn internet mailman  :)

Bill - N1KUG
Boston, Mass
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://scanmaritime.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Marcie via FedCom
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2026 6:03 PM
To: Discussion of Federal Government Communications
Subject: [FedCom] 173.4625

It is confusing cause ICE and others also have that NAC ...I copied around
10am Local time here ...thanks 73,s

Marcy
Yaphank, New York