[GreenKeys] Real RTTY
Lee Reynolds
kd1sq at spamcop.net
Thu Feb 24 20:42:20 EST 2005
Interesting to see Real RTTY versus Computer RTTY as terms being used.
Myself, I look on both means of mark/space generation as being a means to
an desired end. I do miss my old RTTY hardware ('20s/'30s vintage Creed 3X,
Creed 10 tape printer, old Olivetti TTY, Creed 75s and a model 15, various
tape readers, perfs and winders) but conversely I don't miss the mechanical
maintenance that went with 'em.
Of course, warm oil and metal is a scent that computers just can't
recreate. And the synchronized sound of a machine once it gets into the
groove and starts chugging out the old AP Caribbean HF news link.
Thinking about it, though, I do recall that one of the things that most of
the RTTY types (myself included) were always on the lookout for was more
modern machines to replace the older devices we used. The Creed 444, for
example, was a highly desirable item because of its functionality and form
factor. Then I started building a glass TTY interface in the late seventies
as being a really whizzbang device. And then there were the solid state
speed controls for motors, regenerative repeaters for signals, etc....
Thing is, we were reaching (although we didn't know it) for exactly the
kind of RTTY generation means that exist today, courtesy of the PC. Your
average PC/sound card combo can do RTTY stuff that people only dreamt of
thirty years ago.
RTTY's RTTY, regardless of how you generate it, I think. It's what we
choose to generate the signal that differs, is all. If that perfect 14, or
15, 19 set or Mini-Mite ever shows up, I'll happily hang it off the ST-6000
and let rip...
But MMTTY and MixW sure do a good job, too.
Lee
More information about the GreenKeys
mailing list