[Lowfer] Re: Medfer Loop Design

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:27:02 -0400

On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 16:00:37 -0400 "Bill Ashlock" <[email protected]>
writes:
> Mike,
> 
> >Sorry, Bill. Did my post really offend you?
> 
> Heck no! It was late. There had been stories, earlier, of effective 
> Medfer 
> antennas that I was excited about... and then you came through with 
> that one 
> about a 5ft dangling antenna making it to MD! <still chuckling about 
> it> I 
> was just trying to be funny in my reply and sign off as well. Sorry 
> to make 
> you worry.
> 
> BTW: What is going on at the low end of the Medfer band these days, 
> around 
> 530k? Is there a chance of using digital modes to advantage there?
> 
> Bill A
>
There is a good point
first DEX , I believe is at 510.5 could be the start of a watering hole
Tother is the use of real slow QRSS 1n the 1700 area. What will the QSB
do to
the signal,,,, probably QRS3 be the slowest you may want to use,, but
this is also
open to experiment to find the best speed.  That may really be dependent
on how the uhhh Heaviside layer is working at any given time

Bob  K3DJC