[Milsurplus] Re: Milsurplus Digest, Why 60 Hz.
Brooke Clarke
brooke at pacific.net
Sun Jun 19 15:56:02 EDT 2005
Hi Ken:
This is a question that I've also wondered about. The two key figures
are Tesla and Westinghouse. I have a number of possible reasons at:
http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/electron.shtml#Nikola
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
--
w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:16:21 -0700
> From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] 60 Hz.
> To: Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <42B545F5.32509.E3DB8BF at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Patrick Jankowiak wrote:
>
>
>>Can anyone say why 60Hz was chosen?
>
>
> My understanding was that "they" turned up the frequency until the
> lights stopped blinking noticeably. Apparently either the bulbs used
> here had shorter persistence than those used in Europe, or they had
> poorer eyes.
>
> Ken W7EKB
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list